Skip to content

News Details

Julia Alder

Roof Tiling Company Fined for Failing to Provide Fall Protection

  • Mon 20th February 2012
  • Bayswater, AU

The Dandenong Magistrate’s Court on Thursday fined a roof tiling company $7,500 for failing to install fall protection on a Rowville house which led to an apprentice falling 2.4 metres to the ground.

The company was also ordered to pay court costs of $2,894.52.

The Bayswater-based company pleaded guilty to one charge of failing to provide or maintain systems of work under Section 21(1)&(2)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

In March 2010, the company director, three apprentices and a sub-contractor were replacing roof tiles on a storm-damaged house.

An apprentice was carrying buckets of cement up a ladder to the roof where the director was working.

Once on the roof, the apprentice lost his footing and fell to the ground. There was no guard-railings or fall protection in place.

Although he was not injured from the fall, wet cement splashed into his left eye and he ultimately lost sight in that eye.

The court was told the fall and the splashing of the wet cement into his eye was not responsible for the loss of the eye, but set off a chain of events that led to it.

The Magistrate said the $7500 fine would be a serious impost on a small business that made only a ‘modest profit’.

The acting director of WorkSafe’s Construction Division, Allan Beacom, said the provision of safe systems of work, including fall protection, was among the most fundamental of construction industry safety measures.

“It is enormously frustrating that this most fundamental of issues in construction work, and roof tiling in particular, must still be a focus of WorkSafe’s law enforcement activity.

“Despite WorkSafe inspectors issuing notices requiring safety improvements or outright prohibiting dangerous work and many prosecutions, there is still a core of people in this industry who think the law does not apply to them or that a particular situation does not require compliance.

“The outcome in this matter was a very serious injury to a young worker who was owed a much higher duty of care by his employer.

“Apart from the many deaths that have happened as a result of falls from height, the risk of brain damage, ending up in a wheelchair, broken bones or other injuries is high if fall protection is not used.

“In this case the company knew or should have known that the work being undertaken was high risk construction work requiring fall protection.”